← Timeline

ORCL · Write-Ahead — Multi-Analyst Outlook 2026–2031

ORCL · Sep 11, 2026 · Analysis · Claude

⇆ Compare
ORCL$150.28▼ 55% off the Sep ’25 high52-wk $114.50 – $331.00As of Sep 11, 2026

Independent analysis of ORCL — “ORCL · Write-Ahead — Multi-Analyst Outlook 2026–2031”, published Sep 11, 2026 as part of Stock Timelines, a running journal of independent equity research. Featuring consensus target $239, projected target $349 (5y).

Key Research Takeaways: ORCL · Write-Ahead — Multi-Analyst Outlook 2026–2031

Tickers Analyzed
ORCL
Consensus Price Target
$239
Projected Price Target (5y)
$349
Spot Price at Analysis
$150.28 (▼ 55% off the Sep ’25 high)
52-Week Range
$114.5 - $331
Publication Date
Sep 11, 2026
Research Provider
Claude
01 · Equity deep-dive — synthesized analyst desk
ORCL
$150.28 ▼ 55% off the Sep ’25 high
NYSE · ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE / AI INFRASTRUCTUREMKT CAP $432.9B52-WK $114.50 – $331.00AS OF CLOSE FRI 11 SEP 2026

Oracle has written $664 billion to the log. The commit is still years away.

In a database, a change is written to the write-ahead log long before it is committed to disk — and until it commits, it is a promise, not a fact. Oracle has logged a $664B backlog and $161.8B of property against negative $28.7B of trailing free cash flow, funded at BBB−. Q1 FY27 beat on every line and the stock still closed down. Six analyst lenses, three scenarios, four horizons.

The verdict · TL;DR
One question decides the stock: is the $664B backlog a contracted annuity, or a levered bet on one counterparty’s ability to pay? Revenue grew 30%, cloud infrastructure 121%, and the backlog added $209B year-on-year — yet shares opened +8.5% on the print and closed down 1.7%, because capex ran $28.5B against $23.1B of operating cash. The equity story is intact; the financing story is the one being priced. Our probability-weighted five-year path lands almost exactly back at the September 2025 peak — five years of risk for one day’s worth of 2025 price.
5-yr · prob-weighted
$329
+119% vs $150.28
52-week playback · where the tape sits ▼ Round-tripped the entire AI re-rating
$150.28 · 11 Sep 2026 consensus $239 · +59%
$114.50 · 52-wk low · 28 Jul ’26 $331.00 · 52-wk high · 11 Sep ’25
LOG · RPO $664B WRITTEN · PP&E $161.8B PENDING · FCF −$28.7B TTM COMMIT ETA · FY2029
Price history + cone of outcomes · 2024 → 2031
HISTORICALBULLBASEBEARPROB-WTD
$600 $480 $360 $240 $120 $0 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 $331 high · Sep ’25 $114.50 low · Jul ’26 $329 $177 $214 $255 $550 $349 $114 TODAY · $150.28 consensus $239

Gray line = Oracle’s actual monthly closes from Sep 2024 into today — the +36% single-day repricing of 10 Sep 2025, the $331 high on 11 Sep 2025, the worst week since the 2001 dot-com bust in late June 2026, the $114.50 low on 28 Jul 2026, and the round trip back to $150.28. Colored paths = synthesized scenario midpoints forward, default weighting bear 30% · base 45% · bull 25%. Faint vertical rules mark the four horizon nodes. Wall Street’s 12-month consensus of $239 is the dotted clay line. Scale is linear; marks are mid-year.

Re-weight the scenarios

Those probabilities are a judgment call, and on a stock this binary they are the judgment call. Drag to set how likely the bear and bull cases are (base takes the remainder); the blended target below, the dotted line on the chart, and the prob-weighted row of every scenario card update live.

30% bear 45% base 25% bull
Blended 5-yr expected $329 +119% vs $150.28
+30%
Q1 FY27 revenue ($19.3B)
+121%
Cloud infrastructure ($7.4B)
$664B
RPO backlog (+$209B YoY)
+30%
Non-GAAP EPS ($1.92)
60.0%
Gross margin (−730bps YoY)
−$5.4B
Free cash flow (capex $28.5B)
$125.3B
Borrowings vs $36.4B cash
97.9%
GPU capacity utilisation
02 · The panel — six ways to read the same log

Six analyst lenses, six answers — from $105 to $240

The same quarter supports a price target that halves the stock and one that doubles it, depending entirely on which framework you trust. Each lens below is a synthesized expert perspective reasoned independently from the same dated facts, with its own 12-month target and the arithmetic behind it.

Growth / Momentum PM

The Contracted Compounder

RPO of $664B is 9.3x trailing revenue — already signed, with ~50% converting inside 36 months. Demand is physically observable, not modelled: 850MW added in one quarter, 300,000+ GPUs delivered, 97.9% utilisation, renewals repricing 20% higher. The >$30B of Q1 contracts structured as prepayment or bring-your-own-hardware changes the capital model in the bulls’ favour. Gross margin fell on mix; operating margin rose 390bps to 35.3% on a headcount cut from 162k to 141k.

12-MO TARGET $240 · $11.00 FY28E × 22×Conviction: High
Value / FCF / Quality

The Cash Counter

A great annuity has been pledged as collateral for a leveraged GPU landlord. The pre-AI Oracle — FY2024’s $53.0B revenue and $11.8B of free cash flow — is worth roughly $42/share standalone, so $108 of today’s $150 is the AI option. The cumulative cash hole is ~$66B through FY27 and widening; the $20B ATM is already spent; the $2.00 dividend (~$6B/yr) is funded by debt, not cash. FCF inflects no earlier than FY2029 — which is literally S&P’s downgrade trigger.

12-MO TARGET $110 · sum-of-parts / 13× guideConviction: Medium
Short-seller / Disruption skeptic

The Depreciation Trade

Reported earnings exist because depreciation schedules, not economics, decide when the compute dies. PP&E tripled to $161.8B with $90–95B more coming, and management did not address useful lives on the call. On a 3.5-year economic life rather than six, incremental depreciation is ~$13.1B pre-tax — about $3.44 a share. Meanwhile ~50% of a backlog Oracle won’t confirm sits with a counterparty that lost ~$14B in 2026. RPO is a backlog, not a receivable.

12-MO TARGET $105 · $4.60 adj. EPS × 22×Conviction: Medium-High
Moat / Competitive strategy

The Borrowed Moat

One real moat is being used to underwrite a second business that has none. Licence and support — the genuinely defensible part — is $5.5B a quarter and shrinking 3%, while the moatless OCI becomes the valuation. The 20% renewal premium is scarcity rent, not moat rent: a true moat shows up as margin expansion, and gross margin fell 730bps. Database@AWS/Azure/GCP is the one genuine structural asset. Oracle Health losing to Epic a third straight year is what eroding switching costs look like.

12-MO TARGET $142 · $10.10 × 14× blendedConviction: Medium
Quant / Technical

The Contested Tape

Price sits +6.8% over the 50-day ($140.68) and −10.4% under the 200-day ($167.65) with RSI at 51 — no trend, no edge. The 11 September outside-reversal on the best news of the year (gap to $166.00, close $150.28) is the classic exhaustion print. Short interest of 1.66% means there is no squeeze fuel: the −54% drawdown was long holders liquidating. And the correlation regime has shifted — ORCL now trades with CoreWeave and Nebius, not Microsoft and SAP, which is itself a multiple event.

12-MO TARGET $180 · regime-weighted 12/17/24×Conviction: Medium
Macro / Sector strategist

The Rate-Duration Trade

Oracle is levered AI beta priced for falling discount rates in a tightening regime. The 10-year sits near 5% and markets price a hike, not the cut regime that produced the September 2025 melt-up — which explains most of a −54% drawdown as a discount-rate event, not a demand one. Credit is the transmission channel and Oracle is the marginal borrower: BBB−, CDS at an 18-year wide. Server DRAM roughly doubled and NVIDIA flagged >15% price hikes from early 2027 — same compute, more capital.

12-MO TARGET $148 · $9.50 × 15.5×Conviction: Medium

Panel median 12-month target $145; mean $154; range $105–$240. Note the shape of that distribution: the two lenses that focus on cash and on accounting land within $5 of each other near $105–$110, while the lens that focuses on contracted demand lands at $240. They are not disagreeing about the facts. They are disagreeing about whether the backlog or the balance sheet is the binding constraint.

03 · Wall Street’s read

Wall Street 12-month price targets

Forty-three firms cover Oracle; the mean target is $239.10, about 59% above today, with a Strong-Buy skew (28 strong buy, 8 buy, 7 hold, 1 strong sell). Bars are a selection sorted low to high and colored by rating; the slate dashed line is today’s $150.28.

Consensus $239.10 (+59%) · range $110 – $400 · 43 analysts
BUYHOLDSELL
Street low (1 firm) $110 RBC Capital $165 BMO Capital $195 Stifel $200 Morgan Stanley $210 D.A. Davidson $225 Bank of America $240 Wedbush $240 UBS $250 Oppenheimer $275 Cantor Fitzgerald $284 Guggenheim $400 TODAY · $150.28 CONSENSUS · $239

Every target except one sits above today’s price, and the two cuts that landed on 11 Sep 2026 (Stifel $220→$200 on margin pressure; Wedbush had already gone $275→$240 in June) still left Buy ratings intact. That is the tell: the sell-side is trimming multiples, not theses. The gap between the $110 low and the $400 Street high — a 3.6x spread on the same company — is the widest dispersion in mega-cap software, and it exists because the analysts are not modelling different revenue. They are modelling different depreciation and financing. Firm targets and ratings as reported on 11–12 Sep 2026; the $110 low is the single strong-sell rating in the distribution, firm not identified.

04 · Price scenarios — 1 / 2 / 3 / 5 years

Commit, or roll back

Synthesized scenario midpoints, dated mid-year, each built as non-GAAP EPS × an exit multiple. Returns are shown against today’s $150.28. These are illustrative frameworks for thinking about the range — not forecasts. Actual outcomes can and do fall outside the cone.

1 Year

Mid-2027
Bull$267+78%
Base$177+18%
Bear$95−37%
Prob-wtd$175+16%

2 Years

Mid-2028
Bull$340+126%
Base$214+42%
Bear$88−41%
Prob-wtd$208+38%

3 Years

Mid-2029
Bull$425+183%
Base$255+70%
Bear$95−37%
Prob-wtd$250+66%

5 Years

Mid-2031
Bull$550+266%
Base$349+132%
Bear$114−24%
Prob-wtd$329+119%
Bull case — 25% — show the assumptions & math
The Q1 pattern becomes the standard: customers prepay or bring their own hardware, so gross capex of $90–95B converts to far less Oracle capital and free cash flow inflects in FY2028 rather than FY2029. Multicloud (Database@AWS/Azure/GCP) pulls licence and support back from −3% to growth, carrying the high-margin franchise into the AI business. OpenAI funds itself, the Stargate ramp lands on schedule, and Oracle approaches its own FY2030 $225B revenue target. Once FCF is positive, the multiple re-rates back toward software.
FY27E $8.10 (guided) → FY28E $11.60 → FY29E $14.80 → FY31E $25.00 exit multiple held at 23× throughout (vs MSFT ~23.8× today) 1yr $11.60 × 23 = $267 · 2yr $14.80 × 23 = $340 3yr $18.50 × 23 = $425 · 5yr $25.00 × 22 = $550 sanity check: $225B revenue × ~30% non-GAAP net margin / ~3.15B shares ≈ $21/sh
Base case — 45% — show the assumptions & math
The backlog converts roughly on schedule but slowly and expensively. Gross margin stabilises in the high-50s as memory and GPU cost inflation is partly passed through; operating margin holds because the restructuring stays. Capex peaks in FY2028, free cash flow crosses zero in FY2029 — exactly the deadline S&P set — and leverage tops out in the low-4x range without a further downgrade. Dilution continues modestly. The multiple settles at the midpoint of Oracle’s own pre-AI range rather than at a software premium.
FY27E $8.10 (guided) → FY28E $10.40 → FY29E $12.60 → FY31E $20.50 exit multiple held at 17× (mid of ORCL's own ~12-20× 2015-2023 band) 1yr $10.40 × 17 = $177 · 2yr $12.60 × 17 = $214 3yr $15.00 × 17 = $255 · 5yr $20.50 × 17 = $349
Bear case — 30% — show the assumptions & math
AI capex digestion begins in FY2028. OpenAI restructures or stretches its ramp and the RPO-to-revenue bridge resets. Useful lives are shortened toward four years, adding roughly $3 a share of depreciation. Memory and GPU inflation is not passed through, interest expense compounds off $125B+ of borrowings, and a downgrade to high yield raises the cost of the whole buildout. The multiple settles where levered, negative-FCF infrastructure lessors trade — not where software trades. Note the shape: the bear trough is at year two, not year five, because the cash burn peaks before the depreciation normalises.
FY27E $8.10 → FY28E $8.60 → FY29E $8.00 → FY31E $9.50 exit multiple 11× rising to 12× as the balance sheet repairs 1yr $8.60 × 11 = $95 · 2yr $8.00 × 11 = $88 3yr $8.25 × 11.5 = $95 · 5yr $9.50 × 12 = $114 the 5-yr bear ($114) is, almost exactly, the 52-week low of $114.50
Why the probabilities are bear-tilted — 30 / 45 / 25
The default weighting leans bear for three reasons that are specific to this quarter rather than to the narrative. First, the market’s own verdict: an +8.5% gap on a $24B backlog beat that closed down 1.7% is the price mechanism saying the good news was already owned. Second, the credit market has been right before the equity market all year — S&P cut to BBB− in July, CDS sits at an 18-year wide, and both moved ahead of the equity drawdown. Third, the bear case requires nothing new to happen: it needs only that useful lives normalise and that memory inflation is not fully passed through, both of which are already visible in a 730bps gross-margin decline. The bull case, by contrast, requires several things to go right at once. Move the sliders if you disagree — that is what they are for.
05 · Follow the cash

Revenue, capex, free cash flow & debt ($B)

The single most important chart in this report. Until FY2024, Oracle was a cash machine. Three fiscal years later, the capex bar is larger than the revenue bar — and the free-cash-flow bar has gone through the floor. The bull case and the bear case both live in that gap.

Fiscal-year revenue, capex, free cash flow & total debt · FY2024 → FY2027E
REVENUECAPEXFCF POSITIVEFCF NEGATIVETOTAL DEBT
$180 $120 $60 $0 −$60 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027E n/g +$11.8 −$0.4 −$23.7 −$42.0

Fiscal years end 31 May. Capex (clay) went from $6.9B in FY2024 to $55.7B in FY2026 and a guided $90–95B in FY2027 — a 13-fold increase in three years, and in FY2027 it exceeds revenue. Free cash flow (terracotta below the zero line) went +$11.8B → −$0.4B → −$23.7B, with S&P modelling a free operating cash flow deficit of roughly −$42B for FY2027. Total debt (slate) is shown as reported including leases: $94.4B → $109.0B → $167.4B; at 31 Aug 2026 it was $155.9B on that basis, or $125.3B of reported borrowings — and neither figure includes the roughly $288B of future datacenter lease commitments disclosed in the 10-Q but not yet on the balance sheet. FY2027 debt is not guided, so no bar is drawn. The bull reads this chart as investment; the bear reads it as an obligation.

06 · Earnings power

The EPS ladder underneath every target ($)

None of the price targets in this report are pulled from the air — each is this earnings path multiplied by an exit multiple. Which is exactly why the depreciation debate matters: it moves the ladder, not the multiple.

Non-GAAP EPS · reported vs. guided/estimated, FY2024 → FY2028E
REPORTEDGUIDED / ESTIMATED
$0 $3 $6 $9 $12 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027E FY2028E $5.56 $6.03 $7.63 $8.10 $10.40

Non-GAAP is the honest basis here: reported GAAP swings on non-operating items — FY2026’s second quarter booked $2.10 of GAAP EPS against $1.27 the following quarter on investment gains, which is why the trailing 23.6× GAAP multiple flatters the stock. Gray = reported ($5.56 FY24, $6.03 FY25, $7.63 FY26). Clay solid = the FY2027 $8.10 company guidance raised on 10 Sep 2026; clay faded = our base-case FY2028 model of $10.40, which is a model and not a consensus figure. Note the FY27 step: only +6% on a year when revenue grows 34%. That compression — growth in the top line, depreciation and interest in the bottom — is the whole argument in one bar.

07 · Growth scorecard

Nothing here says demand is the problem

Q1 FY2027 (quarter ended 31 Aug 2026), year-over-year. Read these against a stock that is down 54% over the same twelve months.

Year-over-year growth by metric · Q1 FY2027
COREFRONTIERTHE BILL
Software licence + support −3% Services +5% Cloud apps (SaaS) +10% Hardware +15% Total revenue +30% Non-GAAP EPS +30% Remaining perf. obligations +46% GAAP operating income +57% Total cloud revenue +62% Cloud infrastructure (OCI) +121% Capital expenditure +235%

Olive = the steady core; clay = the frontier lines compounding off smaller bases. Only one line is negative, and it is the one that matters most to the moat: legacy licence and support, −3%. The disconnect the bulls point to is real — total revenue +30%, cloud +62%, OCI +121%, backlog +46%, with the stock halved. But the terracotta bar is the honest counterweight, and it is the longest on the chart: capital expenditure grew 235%, from $8.5B to $28.5B in a single quarter. Every other bar on this chart was bought with that one.

08 · The debate

Bull vs. Bear

The entire valuation argument compresses into one disagreement: is the $664B backlog a contracted annuity that converts into cash, or a levered bet on one counterparty’s ability to pay, financed one notch above junk?

▲ THE BULL CASE

  • The backlog is verifiable and still accelerating. RPO $664B, up $209B year-on-year and $26B sequentially, against ~$640B expected — 9.3x trailing revenue already signed, with roughly half converting inside 36 months.
  • Demand is physical, not modelled. 850MW of capacity added in one quarter, 300,000+ GPUs delivered, 97.9% utilisation, and renewals repricing 20% higher. Full utilisation plus pricing power is a shortage signature, not a bubble signature.
  • The capital model changed in Q1. More than $30B of new AI contracts were structured as customer prepayment or bring-your-own-hardware — no incremental Oracle capital — which is why $90–95B of gross capex is framed as net cash capex of “not more than $70B,” and why operating cash flow jumped 184% to $23.1B.
  • Operating leverage is already arriving. GAAP operating margin 35.3% vs 31.4%, GAAP EPS +54%, achieved while headcount fell from ~162,000 to ~141,000. The gross-margin decline is mix; the operating line is going the other way.
  • Concentration is diluting, not concentrating. Management says the non-OpenAI backlog more than doubled year-on-year, with AMD, Meta, NVIDIA, xAI and TikTok named alongside it.
  • The multiple already de-rated. 18.6× guided FY27 earnings with a 0.58 PEG, against Microsoft at ~23.8× growing a third as fast. Forty-three analysts average $239 — and Guggenheim’s Street-high $400 is not a fringe call, it is a database-migration thesis.

▼ THE BEAR CASE

  • The cash is going the wrong way and accelerating. Free cash flow: −$0.4B in FY25, −$23.7B in FY26, −$28.7B trailing, with S&P modelling ~−$42B for FY27. Cumulative hole of roughly $66B before FY2028 even starts.
  • Depreciation is doing the work earnings should be doing. PP&E tripled to $161.8B in twelve months, Oracle did not address useful lives on the call, and shortening them toward four years is worth roughly $3.44 a share of non-GAAP EPS on the short lens’s math.
  • Half the backlog is one unprofitable counterparty. OpenAI is reported at ~50% of RPO — a figure Oracle has never confirmed — while losing ~$14B in 2026 and raising capital at scale. RPO is a backlog, not a receivable, and the Stargate ramp only begins in earnest in 2027.
  • The credit market moved first and it moved down. S&P cut Oracle to BBB− on 9 Jul 2026 — one notch above high yield — with explicit triggers at 4.5× leverage or no positive free operating cash flow by FY2029. Five-year CDS reached ~203bp, the widest in nearly eighteen years.
  • Costs are inflating into the buildout. Server DRAM roughly doubled in Q1 2026 and NVIDIA has flagged >15% price increases from early-2027 shipments. Gross margin already fell 730bps year-on-year while guidance was raised. Something has to give.
  • Equity is now a funding source, not a return. The $20B at-the-market program was fully spent during Q1; diluted share count rose ~144M year-on-year; the $2.00 dividend, roughly $6B a year, is paid out of borrowings.
  • The moat is in the shrinking half. Licence and support — the genuinely defensible business — is down 3%, and Oracle Health lost hospital share to Epic for a third consecutive year, with about a third of sampled customers saying Oracle is not in their long-term plans.
09 · Risk map

Risk map — likelihood × impact

Where each risk sits over a three-to-five-year horizon, not just how large it is. The hot upper-right corner is the one that matters — and unusually for a mega-cap, Oracle has something genuinely sitting in it.

Low impact
Medium impact
High impact
Likely
  • Continued equity dilution
  • Memory & GPU cost inflation
  • Datacenter / power slippage
  • Depreciation-life reset
Possible
  • Rate / discount-rate shock
  • OpenAI concentration
  • Downgrade to high yield
  • AI-capex digestion
Tail
  • Key-man & governance
  • AI credit event

Depreciation-life reset

Likely × High

What breaks: $161.8B of PP&E on assumed five-to-six-year GPU lives; moving toward four cuts non-GAAP EPS by roughly $3 a share and the targets fall with the ladder, not the multiple.

OpenAI concentration

Possible × High

What breaks: a counterparty reported at ~50% of a $664B backlog restructures or stretches its ramp, and the entire revenue bridge behind the cone resets overnight.

Downgrade to high yield

Possible × High

What breaks: BBB− is one notch up; a cut forces index-mandated selling of the debt, raises the cost of the entire buildout, and validates the equity de-rating.

AI-capex digestion

Possible × High

What breaks: ORCL now correlates to CoreWeave and Nebius, not Microsoft. A sector-wide capex pause takes the multiple regardless of Oracle’s own execution.

Memory & GPU cost inflation

Likely × Medium

What breaks: DRAM roughly doubled and NVIDIA flagged >15% increases from early 2027 — the same contracted compute now consumes more capital and thinner margin.

Datacenter / power slippage

Likely × Medium

What breaks: depreciation and interest start on schedule; revenue does not. Oracle has to keep landing 850MW a quarter into interconnection queues it does not control.

AI credit event

Tail × High

What breaks: a funding failure at a major AI lab or neocloud reprices the sector’s credit at once. Low odds — but Oracle is the most levered instance of the trade, with CDS already at an 18-year wide.

Rate / discount-rate shock

Possible × Medium

What breaks: a long-duration, negative-free-cash-flow asset loses roughly a turn of P/E per 25bp of terminal discount rate — and it refinances into whatever the curve offers.

Key-man & governance

Tail × Medium

What breaks: Larry Ellison is chairman, CTO, ~40% holder and the dealmaker behind the OpenAI contract; two co-CEOs since Sep 2025 and a CFO since Apr 2026 carry the execution.

Continued equity dilution

Likely × Low

What breaks: share count is already up ~144M year-on-year after the $20B ATM; another raise caps per-share upside even in the scenarios where the thesis works.

10 · Plain-language glossary

The jargon, decoded

Hover the dotted terms in the metrics and prose, or scan the desk’s working definitions here.

RPO / backlog
Remaining performance obligations — revenue under signed contract that has not yet been delivered or recognised. $664B here. It is a promise to buy, not cash in the bank, and it can be renegotiated.
Free cash flow
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure — what is actually left over. Oracle’s is −$28.7B over the trailing twelve months, because capex ($75.7B) exceeded operating cash flow ($46.9B).
FCF yield
Free cash flow divided by market value. Normally the cleanest cheapness test; for Oracle today it is negative, which is why the value lens is bearish on the stock while constructive on the business.
EV / EBITDA
Enterprise value (equity plus net debt, $551.7B) over earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation. 16.1× here. It counts the debt that a P/E ratio ignores.
Useful life / depreciation
How many years a GPU or datacenter is written off over. Longer lives spread the cost thinner and flatter near-term earnings; the argument is whether Oracle’s assumed lives match economic reality.
BBB− / investment grade
S&P’s lowest investment-grade rating — one notch above high yield. Below it, many funds are mandated to sell the bonds, so the cost of borrowing steps up sharply.
CDS spread
Credit default swap spread — the annual cost of insuring against default, in basis points. Oracle’s reached ~203bp, the widest in nearly eighteen years. The credit market’s live opinion.
ATM offering
An at-the-market equity program: selling new shares gradually into the open market. Oracle completed $20B of it in one quarter, which funds the buildout but dilutes existing holders.
Exit multiple
The P/E assumed at the end of the forecast period. Multiply it by projected EPS to get a target price — every number in the scenario cards is built this way.
Prob-weighted
Each scenario’s price multiplied by its probability, summed into one expected value across bear, base and bull. The clay row and the dotted line on the chart.
NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE

As-of date: all prices and market data reflect the close of Friday 11 September 2026; the analysis was run on 12 September 2026. Markets move — treat every figure as of that date and re-check before acting.

Sources & method: Oracle Q1 FY2027 earnings release and Form 10-Q (quarter ended 31 Aug 2026, released 10 Sep 2026); Oracle Q4/FY2026 release (10 Jun 2026); Oracle FY2025 release; the Q1 FY2027 earnings call transcript (11 Sep 2026); Oracle’s February 2026 equity-and-debt financing plan announcement; StockAnalysis.com quote, statistics, financials, forecast and ratings pages (accessed 12 Sep 2026); S&P Global Ratings action of 9 Jul 2026; Synergy Research cloud market-share releases; KLAS 2026 EHR market-share report (14 May 2026); CNBC, Reuters, Investing.com, ERP Today and Fortune reporting, June–September 2026. Where aggregators conflicted with primary filings, the filing was used and the conflict noted in the text.

Known conflicts, disclosed: Oracle’s reported borrowings at 31 Aug 2026 were $125.3B; the same balance sheet reads $155.9B including capitalised leases and ~$167B on S&P’s adjusted basis — all three appear in circulation and all three are used here with their basis stated. Roughly $288B of future datacenter lease commitments sit outside every one of those figures. The frequently cited “OpenAI is ~50% of RPO” figure comes from S&P and third-party reporting, not from Oracle disclosure, and Oracle has never confirmed it. Vendor quotes for the 11 Sep close ranged $150.28–$150.92; $150.28 is used throughout. FY2028 EPS of $10.40 is this desk’s base-case model, not a published consensus figure.

On the analyst panel: the six “lenses” are synthesized analytical frameworks reasoned independently from the same fact base — they are not real individuals, not real firms, and not real firm ratings. The Wall Street targets chart is separate and does report actual published sell-side targets as of 11–12 September 2026. Scenario prices are illustrative frameworks for bounding a range, not forecasts; real outcomes can and do land outside the cone, and the probability weights are a judgment call you are invited to override with the sliders.

Not financial advice — do your own research and consider consulting a licensed financial advisor.